{"id":39387,"date":"2021-06-18T08:06:17","date_gmt":"2021-06-18T08:06:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/setterwalls.se\/case\/setterwalls-successfully-represented-jollyroom-in-a-dispute-over-unfair-marketing-3\/"},"modified":"2024-04-08T07:22:20","modified_gmt":"2024-04-08T07:22:20","slug":"setterwalls-successfully-represented-jollyroom-in-a-dispute-over-unfair-marketing-3","status":"publish","type":"assignments","link":"https:\/\/setterwalls.se\/en\/case\/setterwalls-successfully-represented-jollyroom-in-a-dispute-over-unfair-marketing-3\/","title":{"rendered":"Setterwalls successfully represented Jollyroom in a dispute over unfair marketing"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>The Patent and Market Court approved Jollyroom&#8217;s claim regarding an injunction under penalty of a fine for unfair marketing against Babyland.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Setterwalls has represented Jollyroom, one of the Nordic region&#8217;s largest e-retailer in children&#8217;s and baby products, in a dispute over unfair marketing against competitor Babyland. Jollyroom brought an action regarding prohibitory injunction under penalty of a fine for eight different types of marketing claims used by Babyland, all of which made Babyland&#8217;s prices appear more favorable than they really were. Babyland disputed that bans would be issued for two of the eight types of claims. After a year and a half of litigation, the Patent and Market Court issued judgment on June 26, 2020. Jollyroom&#8217;s case was upheld on all counts, and Babyland was prohibited under penalty of a fine of one millions SEK for using the eight different marketing claims.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p><strong>The Patent and Market Court approved Jollyroom&#8217;s claim regarding an injunction under penalty of a fine for unfair marketing against Babyland.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Setterwalls has represented Jollyroom, the Nordic region&#8217;s largest e-retailer in children&#8217;s and baby products, in a dispute over unfair marketing against competitor Babyland. Jollyroom brought an action regarding prohibitory injunction under penalty of a fine for eight different types of marketing claims used by Babyland, all of which made Babyland&#8217;s prices appear more favorable than they really were. Babyland disputed that bans would be issued for two of the eight types of claims. After a year and a half of litigation, the Patent and Market Court issued judgment on June 26, 2020. Jollyroom&#8217;s case was upheld on all counts, and Babyland was prohibited under penalty of a fine of one millions SEK for using the eight different marketing claims.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":33975,"template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":""},"class_list":["post-39387","assignments","type-assignments","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/setterwalls.se\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/assignments\/39387","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/setterwalls.se\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/assignments"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/setterwalls.se\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/assignments"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/setterwalls.se\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/setterwalls.se\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/33975"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/setterwalls.se\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=39387"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}